50.1K

Verified Solution

Link Copied!

While many of you Senators have spoken in favor for this bill on the grounds of reducing student debt, what about government debt, regarding the Federal budget? Nanny state or happy nation? legal or illegal status, and debt forgiveness for students," progressive Democrats want to expand the reach of government to fund these needs. What do you think? The meme below claims one of the most generous "social welfare systems" in the world. Denmark may tax nearly half of one's income, but there are generally no extreme rich or poor, and the many benefits "they get for free" are after all the ones most of us "pay for" out of our own pocket. That is what I don't quite "get" about Americans who resist taxes. Not that I like it. However, one way or the other, we pay for medical care, libraries, education, roads, FEMA, SSI, EBT, you get the idea. I tell my friends this when they delight in "free vaccines" or "stimulus checks." The money gets taken out of those of us who pay taxes and pay insurance premiums. So, is it more of a long-term "happiness" to take a bigger chunk out of everyone's paycheck to move towards the "democratic socialist welfare state" like Scandinavia, Canada, Germany, Britain, and much of Europe? Or do we insist on lower tax rates while we shell out the $$ for our own college or training, our medications and hospital visits, and hundreds of programs that may have been cut by those opposed to "tax and spend"? P.S. I passed a billboard urging for Montana state-funded aid to assist those who have children, given "88\% of parents cannot afford infant While many of you Senators have spoken in favor for this bill on the grounds of reducing student debt, what about government debt, regarding the Federal budget? Nanny state or happy nation? legal or illegal status, and debt forgiveness for students," progressive Democrats want to expand the reach of government to fund these needs. What do you think? The meme below claims one of the most generous "social welfare systems" in the world. Denmark may tax nearly half of one's income, but there are generally no extreme rich or poor, and the many benefits "they get for free" are after all the ones most of us "pay for" out of our own pocket. That is what I don't quite "get" about Americans who resist taxes. Not that I like it. However, one way or the other, we pay for medical care, libraries, education, roads, FEMA, SSI, EBT, you get the idea. I tell my friends this when they delight in "free vaccines" or "stimulus checks." The money gets taken out of those of us who pay taxes and pay insurance premiums. So, is it more of a long-term "happiness" to take a bigger chunk out of everyone's paycheck to move towards the "democratic socialist welfare state" like Scandinavia, Canada, Germany, Britain, and much of Europe? Or do we insist on lower tax rates while we shell out the $$ for our own college or training, our medications and hospital visits, and hundreds of programs that may have been cut by those opposed to "tax and spend"? P.S. I passed a billboard urging for Montana state-funded aid to assist those who have children, given "88\% of parents cannot afford infant

Answer & Explanation Solved by verified expert

See Answer