A company manager believes that a person’s ability to be aleader is directly correlated to their zodiac sign. He neverselects someone to chair a committee without first evaluating theirzodiac sign. An irate employee sets out to prove her manager wrong.She claims that if zodiac sign truly makes a difference inleadership, then a random sample of 200 CEO’s in our country wouldreveal a difference in zodiac sign distribution. She finds thefollowing zodiac signs for her random sample of 200 CEO’s:
Births | Signs |
23 | Aries |
12 | Taurus |
16 | Gemini |
20 | Cancer |
14 | Leo |
16 | Virgo |
15 | Libra |
14 | Scorpio |
20 | Sagittarius |
11 | Capricorn |
17 | Aquarius |
22 | Pisces |
Can she conclude that zodiac sign makes a difference in whetheror not a person makes a good leader?
Hypotheses:
H0: There is a difference/no difference in leadershipability based on zodiac sign.
H1: There is a difference/no difference in leadershipability based on zodiac sign.
Enter the test statistic - round to 4 decimal places.
___
Enter the p-value - round to 4 decimal places.
___
Can it be concluded that there is a statistically significantdifference in leadership ability based on zodiac sign?
Yes/No
