A person giving advice can be liable for negligence not only to a person they...
50.1K
Verified Solution
Link Copied!
Question
Accounting
A person giving advice can be liable for negligence not only to a person they directly advise but also to third parties. Which of the following is not a requirement to establish a duty of care in this situation:
Group of answer choices
The person giving advice knew or should have known that the advice would be communicated to the third-party individually or as a member of an identified class.
The person giving advice knew or should have known that the advice would be so communicated for a purpose that would be very likely to lead the third party to enter a transaction of the kind entered by them.
The person giving advice knew or should have known that it would be very likely the third party would enter such a transaction in reliance on the advice and risk incurring a loss if the advice is wrong or unsound.
The person giving the advice communicated with the third party in relation to the advice.
Answer & Explanation
Solved by verified expert
Get Answers to Unlimited Questions
Join us to gain access to millions of questions and expert answers. Enjoy exclusive benefits tailored just for you!
Membership Benefits:
Unlimited Question Access with detailed Answers
Zin AI - 3 Million Words
10 Dall-E 3 Images
20 Plot Generations
Conversation with Dialogue Memory
No Ads, Ever!
Access to Our Best AI Platform: Flex AI - Your personal assistant for all your inquiries!
