90.2K

Verified Solution

Link Copied!

ACTG 4650 Due November 6 Acme Corp., a calendar-year-end company, has multiple uncertain tax positions (UTPs) related to its 2015 federal tax return. Some UTPs met the more-likelythan-not recognition threshold on the basis of 3D Printing's initial assessment while others did not. During 2017, the IRS audited the 2015 tax return. During Q3 2017, the examining agents verbally indicated the preliminary conclusion on certain UTPs, and the IRS and Acme formalized their agreement on these UTPs by signing IRS Form 906, Closing Agreement on Final Determination Covering Specific Matters," in 04 2017. Subsequently, in 01 2018, the IRS completed its examination of the 2013 tax return whereby the IRS and Acme agreed to the final closing agreement Acme does not intend to appeal or litigate any aspects of the examined UTPs, and it is remote that the IRS would examine or reexamine any aspects of the 2015 federal tax return. Refer to the table below for further facts on each of the UTPs. . For each tax position taken on its 2015 federal tax return: a. When can Acme assert an "effective settlement b. When should Acme adjust previously recognized amounts in the financial statements, if any? 2. Does Acme have a basis to change its assessment of similar tax positions taken in other periods if it concludes it meets the effective settlement conditions related to the UTPs included in its 2015 tax return? Provide authoritative support for positions taken Represents the amount of the tax benefit liability from the UTP the company recognized. For example, if the UTP resulted in a decrease of S100,000 to the overall tax liability and 70% of the benefit was recognized, the company recorded a $70,000 liability associated with the UTP assuming a liability ACTG 4650 Due November 6 Acme Corp., a calendar-year-end company, has multiple uncertain tax positions (UTPs) related to its 2015 federal tax return. Some UTPs met the more-likelythan-not recognition threshold on the basis of 3D Printing's initial assessment while others did not. During 2017, the IRS audited the 2015 tax return. During Q3 2017, the examining agents verbally indicated the preliminary conclusion on certain UTPs, and the IRS and Acme formalized their agreement on these UTPs by signing IRS Form 906, Closing Agreement on Final Determination Covering Specific Matters," in 04 2017. Subsequently, in 01 2018, the IRS completed its examination of the 2013 tax return whereby the IRS and Acme agreed to the final closing agreement Acme does not intend to appeal or litigate any aspects of the examined UTPs, and it is remote that the IRS would examine or reexamine any aspects of the 2015 federal tax return. Refer to the table below for further facts on each of the UTPs. . For each tax position taken on its 2015 federal tax return: a. When can Acme assert an "effective settlement b. When should Acme adjust previously recognized amounts in the financial statements, if any? 2. Does Acme have a basis to change its assessment of similar tax positions taken in other periods if it concludes it meets the effective settlement conditions related to the UTPs included in its 2015 tax return? Provide authoritative support for positions taken Represents the amount of the tax benefit liability from the UTP the company recognized. For example, if the UTP resulted in a decrease of S100,000 to the overall tax liability and 70% of the benefit was recognized, the company recorded a $70,000 liability associated with the UTP assuming a liability

Answer & Explanation Solved by verified expert

See Answer