using excel data analysis tool for two factor anova, following
o/p Is obtained : write data>menu>data>data
analysis>anova :two factor without replication>enter required
labels>ok, and following o/p Is obtained,
Anova: Two-Factor Without Replication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY |
Count |
Sum |
Average |
Variance |
|
|
compact |
2 |
92 |
46 |
32.000 |
|
|
intermediate |
2 |
102 |
51 |
72.000 |
|
|
full
sized |
2 |
106 |
53 |
128.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
computerized |
3 |
168 |
56 |
31.000 |
|
|
electronic |
3 |
132 |
142 |
3.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANOVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source of
Variation |
SS |
df |
MS |
F |
P-value |
F
crit |
Rows |
52.00 |
2 |
26.00 |
3.25 |
0.24 |
19.00 |
Columns |
216.00 |
1 |
216.00 |
27.00 |
0.04 |
18.51 |
Error |
16.00 |
2 |
8.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
284.00 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
a)
H0: μComputerized =
μElectronic
Ha: μComputerized â‰
μElectronic
value of the test statistic.=3.25
p value=0.035
p value <α=0.05, reject Ho
Reject H0. There is sufficient
evidence to conclude that the mean tune-up times are not the same
for both analyzers