BUSINESS LAW!!!
Mary Slough contracted with Castlerock Building Inc., which wasowned by Max Nitzer, to remodel a house. Nitzer estimated the costat $500,000. Eventually, however, Mary paid Nitzer more that $1.3million. Mary sought to be reimbursed but Nitzer could not providean accounting for the project. Specifically, he could not explaindouble and triple charges, nor whether the amount Mary pad hadactually been spent on the house. Meanwhile, Nitzer had commingledpersonal and corporate funds. As for Castlerock, it has issued noshares of stock, and the minutes of the corporate meetings "alllooked the same." Mary sues Castlerock and Nitzer. As the Courtreviewing these facts, would you hold Nitzer personally liable? Whyor Why not?
