discuss arguments for and against the exclusionary rule. explain
whether or not you believe we should...
90.2K
Verified Solution
Link Copied!
Question
Psychology
discuss arguments for and against the exclusionary rule. explainwhether or not you believe we should have the rule
Answer & Explanation
Solved by verified expert
4.3 Ratings (794 Votes)
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution The decision in Mapp v Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment The decision in Miranda v Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicit selfincriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendants Sixth Amendment right to counsel However the rule does not apply in civil cases including deportation hearings See INS v LopezMendoza Derivatives of Excluded Evidence If evidence that falls within the scope of the exclusionary rule led law enforcement to other evidence which they would not otherwise have located then the exclusionary rule applies to the newly discovered evidence subject
See Answer
Get Answers to Unlimited Questions
Join us to gain access to millions of questions and expert answers. Enjoy exclusive benefits tailored just for you!
Membership Benefits:
Unlimited Question Access with detailed Answers
Zin AI - 3 Million Words
10 Dall-E 3 Images
20 Plot Generations
Conversation with Dialogue Memory
No Ads, Ever!
Access to Our Best AI Platform: Flex AI - Your personal assistant for all your inquiries!