Harlick v. Blue Shield of California 1. Who were the parties involved in the case?...
60.1K
Verified Solution
Link Copied!
Question
Accounting
Harlick v. Blue Shield of California
1. Who were the parties involved in the case? (plaintiff/defendant/respondent/petitioner)
Jeanene Harlick the plaintiff and Blue Shield of California the defendant
2. What were the facts in the case?
For more than 20 years, Harlick, a 38-year-old female, suffered from anorexia nervosa, an eating disorder. She was covered by her employers health insurance plan through Blue Shield, and was treated for her disorder through this plan. Her doctor then advised her that she required residential treatment. Harlick and her doctors ultimately determined that none of the in-network facilities suggested by Blue Shield could provide effective treatment, so she registered at a residential treatment facility that specialized in eating disorders. While Blue Shield paid for the first 11 days of treatment, it then refused to pay for the rest of her treatment.
3. What was the Rule of Law in the case? (Rule of law the court applies to determine the rights of the parties)
Fill in the blank
4.Who won the case? Why?
Fill in the blank
Answer & Explanation
Solved by verified expert
Get Answers to Unlimited Questions
Join us to gain access to millions of questions and expert answers. Enjoy exclusive benefits tailored just for you!
Membership Benefits:
Unlimited Question Access with detailed Answers
Zin AI - 3 Million Words
10 Dall-E 3 Images
20 Plot Generations
Conversation with Dialogue Memory
No Ads, Ever!
Access to Our Best AI Platform: Flex AI - Your personal assistant for all your inquiries!
