Here is another dilemma that could be presented to individualsto determine what their levels of moral reasoning might be(according to Kohlberg):
\"Two young men, brothers, had got into serious trouble. Theywere secretly leaving town in a hurry and needed money. Karl, theolder one, broke into a store and stole a thousand dollars. Bob,the younger one, went to a retired old man who was known to helppeople in town. He told the man that he was very sick and that heneeded a thousand dollars to pay for an operation. Bob asked theold man to lend him the money and promised that he would pay himback when he recovered. Really Bob wasn't sick at all, and he hadno intention of paying the man back. Although the old man didn'tknow Bob very well, he lent him the money. So Bob and Karl skippedtown, each with a thousand dollars. Which is worse, stealing likeKarl or cheating like Bob? Why is that worse?\"
Explain the fundamental differences between the preconventional,conventional, and postconventional levels of moral reasoning?Provide examples of an answer someone might give at each level (youdo not need to break it down by the six subcategories) to supportyour thinking.
