It is inevitable that as an evaluator, you will run into peoplewho use results selectively, misrepresent results (intentionally orunintentionally), or suppress relevant information. In theparticular situation in the case study, how could you as theevaluator serve the greater good or public interest? In yourinitial post, provide pros and cons for the following options:
- Keep silent.
- Go public.
- Leak the results.
- Submit a protest to the mayor.
- Push back privately through health department and mayor’saides.
