Melnick built a house for Gintzler, but the foundation was defective. Gintzler agreed to accpet...
70.2K
Verified Solution
Link Copied!
Question
Accounting
Melnick built a house for Gintzler, but the foundation was defective. Gintzler agreed to accpet the foundation if Melnick guranteed to make future repairs caused by the defects. Melnick agreed but later refused to make any repairs. Melnick argued that his promise to make future reparis was unsupported by consideration. Who will win the suti? Is either party acting unethically? Which one, and why?
Answer & Explanation
Solved by verified expert
Get Answers to Unlimited Questions
Join us to gain access to millions of questions and expert answers. Enjoy exclusive benefits tailored just for you!
Membership Benefits:
Unlimited Question Access with detailed Answers
Zin AI - 3 Million Words
10 Dall-E 3 Images
20 Plot Generations
Conversation with Dialogue Memory
No Ads, Ever!
Access to Our Best AI Platform: Flex AI - Your personal assistant for all your inquiries!
