See the "Zane Corbin, Accounting Major" case for this question.Reportedly, one member of the hearing panel believed Zane wasguilty of the charge filed against him but voted to acquit himbecause the adverse consequences Zane faced if the Upchurch Medalwas rescinded far outweighed the severity of the "indiscretion" hehad committed. Was that a reasonable or appropriate justificationfor voting to acquit Zane? Defend your answer.
