Suppose you have a theory that your organization's back safetytraining program is not producing notable results in reducing backinjuries.  Your theory is that performing more backsafety training is not corresponding to reduction in back injuries.You calculate the correlation coefficient comparing the number ofback safety training sessions over the course of three years withthe number of  back injuries. Your calculation yields thefollowing number: 0.2. How would you, in statistical terms,describe the correlation number and what would you concluderegarding theory?
| A. | Weak positive correlation. The appears to be little to nostatistical correlation to support the efficacy of the back safetytraining. |
| B. | Strong positive correlation. The appears to be strongstatistical correlation to support the efficacy of the back safetytraining. |
| C. | Weak negative correlation. The appears to be no statisticalcorrelation to support the efficacy of the back safetytraining. |
| D. | Weak positive correlation. The appears to be strong statisticalcorrelation to support the efficacy of the back safetytraining. |
