1). In approximately 350 words, please:
Summarize and briefly explain Thomson’s “ailingviolinist†case. What are the details of the case? What areThomson’s moral intuitions about the case? And how (specifically)is Thomson’s violinist case supposed to motivate an argument infavor of the moral permissibility of abortion in certain cases? Inother words, how is Thomson’s argument is supposed to work and whatis it supposed to ultimately show? Do you think Thomson’s argumentis a good one? Explain why or why not.
2).  In approximately 350 words,please:
Summarize and briefly explain Marquis' argument for theimpermissibility of abortion. What specific considerations doesMarquis use to support his argument? According to Marquis, what isit (most fundamentally) that makes killing wrong? And how(specifically) is Marquis’ view about the wrongness of killingsupposed to motivate an argument in favor of the moralimpermissibility of abortion? Do you think Marquis’ argument is agood one? Explain why or why not.
